RH Bill Revealing Stastics and Cold Hard Cash | My Family Health ...

If you think those pictures of Filipinas on Google Images today in 2012 are too sexy for their own reproductive good? imagine how much sexier our grand mothers were in the 1960s?

RH Bill 2012? aka Responsible Parenthood? aka Population Control? because the main idea, the thesis is that Filipino women are multiplying exorbitantly like rabbits and these Filipino women be taught ?Reproductive Health? which has everything to do with contraception? or how not to make babies? condoms, pills, injectables, IUDs, patches and ligation to clamp down on the Filipina oozing sexuality over fertile charms? to save on building more classrooms as President NoyNoy just said in his SONA 2012.

Filipinas are too sexy for their own good? they reproduce like rabbits. This is why they must be slapped with the RH Bill and every contraceptive arsenal available? now to be called ?essential medicines.?

Click to Enlarge

If you think those pictures of Filipinas on Google Images today in 2012 are too sexy for their own reproductive good? imagine how much sexier our grand mothers were in the 1960s with 7+ children per woman on a NATIONAL AVERAGE at that time! Oooohhh lala grandmas!

Let?s begin with again the thesis and holy grail of RH Bill supporters, that Filipinos are being allegedly DENIED access to contraception:

?In the Philippines, access to contraceptives is limited for the most part to those with the means to pay. The Catholic Church has fought a ?reproductive health bill? in the legislature that would change that.? ? http://soc.li/84DB5Wi

Along with the heart warming example:

But after her third child was born, the mayor of Manila ? with the blessing of Roman Catholic bishops ? halted the distribution of contraceptives at public clinics to promote ?a culture of life.? The order put birth control pills and other contraceptives out of reach for millions of poor Filipinos, who could not afford to buy them at private pharmacies.

?For us, the banning of the pills was ugly,? Naz said. ?We were the ones who suffered.?

At 36, she had more children than teeth, common for poor women after repeated pregnancies and breast-feeding.

? http://soc.li/84DB5Wi

Going to the discussion I had over in Facebook, this is how it went:

Is this single example true for the entire population of Metro Manila?

I said:

?Total Fertility Rate of women in Metro Manila these days is around 1.5 to 1.7 children per woman. Replacement TFR is 2.3 for a developing country. Meaning Metro Manila is BELOW TFR in 2012. The example given is the statistical insignificant oddity. Double check with the NSO for factual fertility stats. Billions of pesos to be spent needs to match with statistical facts, not figments of the imagination.?

And an RH Bill supporter said:

?Pretty sure the example you?ve given is the oddity Edwin. Total Philippines TFR is pretty well double the Manila figure.

Meanwhile, when I lived in Cebu I found that compared to other countries I?ve lived, buying contraceptives was unnecessarily difficult and embarrassing. Happy to go into details if you?d like.?

So of course I went on to REVEAL STATISTICS to show this alleged NATIONWIDE Philippine ?embarrassing statistics?? Let?s see now shall we?

Click http://goo.gl/rAOLa to Google for ?fertility growth rate Philippines? and the first result shows the graph of the total fertility rate of the Philippines from 1960 to 2010? FIFTY (50) solid years of statistics.

TFR Philippines 1960 to 2010: 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 according to the World Bank and graphed by Google. Look at that slope. It?s a straight line, get a ruler to extrapolate the next 10 years and the next 20 years. And this is without any RH Bill.

Click to Enlarge

Did you see the pretty slope? Without the EXPENSIVE RH BIll, the slope of TFR is TRUE and SURE. It is downwards? 7+, 6, 5, 4, 3? NATIONALLY. And 3.0 TFR is not so far away from replacement level of 2.3 for a developing country? right? It is GREAT that figures like this are now PUBLIC.

So where is the MATH RATIONAL for a multi-BILLION peso expensive RH Bill when the hard statistics show that women are indeed CONTRACEPTING IMMENSELY and ASSUREDLY? Aren?t depopulation supporters HAPPY with the GRAPH of true and sure downward TFR?

1. Are depopulation supporters UNHAPPY with the DOWNWARD SLOPE of the TFR?

2. Are the depopulation supporters UNAWARE of this very public TFR graph?

3. Don?t you think all that Multi Billion Pesos you wish to SPEND on a SURE WHITE ELEPHANT called the RH BILL be put to better use for more WORTHY endeavours where STATISTICAL STUDIES actually support the NEED?

RH Bill supporters should stop being fixated with religion and Catholicism. The main issue is STATISTICS, Numbers, Graphs, Peso Costs? Benefit. Just like a real CEO of a company needs solid justifications for massive multi-billion peso investments. The graphs DO NOT show the worthiness of spending BILLIONS of PESOS on a desired outcome that has ALREADY BEEN ACHIEVED. That of suppressing / clamping down / dampening of the sexy Filipinas appeal for skin to skin real sex.

Since the TFR is already assuredly sliding down lower and lower from 7 6 5 4 3? you depopulation fans probably need to give yourselves a pat on the back that yes? all the USAID funding for population control since the 1960s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s have been truly effective. The contraception education saturation is already a complete success. It is time to move on to more worthy projects that BILLIONS of pesos will SOLVE.

This has been a public service message to present a rational discussion in place of Anti-Catholic hysteria.

Share share share!

Share and Enjoy

Source: http://www.myhealthblog.org/2012/07/26/rh-bill-revealing-stastics-and-cold-hard-cash/

andrew luck andrew luck trent richardson robert griffin iii dontari poe space shuttle nyc monkeypox